I’ve ‘passed’ my oral exams…
I use quotes because while I passed it wasn’t a clean pass in my opinion. I did a piss poor job, not because I didn’t understand the material per say or because I didn’t really know what I was talking about, but rather I just had a total communication break down. Not being able to breath since I have a head cold and thus couldn’t sleep more than 3 hours the night before might’ve had something to do with it though…
So I got a lecture about my poor communication and imprecise notation. The embarrassing part is that I’m not a total idiot. I can communicate my ideas both precisely and clearly. I do sometimes rush and come across a bit hurried, and that is a problem, but generally, my command of language and notation is not the pure shit that I used during my oral exams. So I don’t blame them for feeling the need to lecture me. I was already lecturing myself out in the hall while they discussed my fate.
But I can’t take any pride in my success on this one and now I have to dig myself out of this perceived hole that I’m a blithering idiot who can’t communicate my ideas with at least 3 of the 5 people who were on my exam committee.
Now for the part where I bitch about the exams for a second.
I still fail to see how oral pop quizzes prepare you for any aspect for a life of research. Outside of job interviews this just isn’t an environment you’ll find yourself in… well damn near ever. I suppose you could argue that it’s somehow akin to answering questions after a lecture or presentation… but those situations tend to involve questions specific to the presented material which you’ll probably have spent a bit of time studying and preparing… since you’re presenting it. Additionally, here at Hopkins CS you have to do these oral exams exactly once… unless you fuck up big time. So clearly the program isn’t putting an emphasis on the need to be able to interview well or else there’d be a series of these things…. Well I suppose they’d want to emphasize you’re ability to teach by having you prepare and teach a class… oh.. no that’s not a requirement either…. hrms…. being a TA? nope…. well…. soo what is the point of these oral exams… it must be to weed out the dumb ones… but since you still need a thesis committee and an advisor to complete a Ph.D. you already have to convince a few people that you’re not an idiot…..
Soooo…. um… right… well at least I’m done with this and don’t have to do it again…
Note of respect:
In case any of my GBO committee members read this, I agree with you all that I royally fucked up my communication during the GBO. I was half asleep and my brain was not working well due to a multi-day lack of sleep and a sinus infection, but that’s not a very good excuse I suppose. I have taken what you said to heart and, though I know it didn’t come across when you all talked to me, I do highly value communication and precision as abilities necessary to succeed in life. I just don’t feel that these exams are a good way to judge someone’s ability to communicate in a more professional setting. It would probably be a better test to have each committee member submit a question or topic in advance that requires a 5 to 10 minute presentation and then ask questions regarding that presentation.